From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:38:13 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87egfzuwca.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83611eqk9w.fsf@gnu.org> <878u6ax7c7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2ptq5t3.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kxx60e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877flswse5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737wgw7kf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87io5bv1it.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447076336 14536 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 13:38:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:38:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 14:38:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvmef-0006NM-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:38:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvmef-0003aI-CO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvmeQ-0003aB-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:38:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvmeL-0005M1-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:38:26 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvmeK-0005Lq-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvmeI-0005zS-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:38:18 +0100 Original-Received: from 98.229.60.157 ([98.229.60.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:38:18 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 98.229.60.157 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:38:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.229.60.157 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fIftkH3GleYAPMo5rM+Ro5s98Rw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193706 Archived-At: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:27:00 +0100 Aurélien Aptel wrote: AA> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I checked this branch: `git fetch git@github.com:aaptel/emacs-dynamic-module.git dynamic-modules-2`? AA> Correct >> It's not been rebased against origin/master and there are many small >> commits. I don't actually know what's the policy on merging such a major >> branch from a non-committer[1]: should I rebase, squash, or preserve the >> history? Does anyone know? AA> Whatever you do, I don't think its useful to preserve the history of AA> my branch. I would suggest maybe splitting commits for the most AA> invasive changes (throw/signal, Fload/load-suffixes, new user_ptr AA> type) and import the completely new stuff in a single commit (all the AA> content of modules/ basically). I know Philip tried to write Changelog AA> entries for some commits in the commit message that can be re-used. If AA> can try to make a new branch that can be re-based on master with the AA> commits I had in mind if you want. Yes, please go ahead if you can. You know best which commits are "milestones" and which are not worth preserving. The rebasing can be part of your work. >> I also don't know if Philipp, who has many changes in that branch, has >> signed the contributor papers. AA> I thought he did, but I cannot find any commits on master from him so AA> I guess he didn't. That could be a problem, unfortunately. Let's wait for Philipp to comment. Ted