From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: First draft of the Emacs website Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:07:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87egf2r38l.fsf@petton.fr> References: <565EE871.6030805@gmail.com> <87d1uproci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878u5cswx2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9k0svqq.fsf@petton.fr> <87vb8fhobv.fsf@petton.fr> <87k2ovons3.fsf@gmail.com> <87si3jhkka.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449220080 14705 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2015 09:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: flexibeast@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 04 10:07:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mLF-00062C-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39518 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mLE-0005H4-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:07:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mLB-0005Gy-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mL7-0003k4-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:07:44 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4mL7-0003jX-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A2620435 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 04:07:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 04:07:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=aw25r0kCWwYaaYmvAFpjv1Ob77E=; b=rLJal bYpuSZu77JpKafJp8xOFrLqwuNjzBmApVMvArkckPfeQv1Iy05nf3KKWW7Q+xbPN A3ImTAOYbisSLXEVFsdzz4ULUi62NuHl/+3Jui0s4FOQluM94LTdXusqy7C/UC/s tKx3Wr2YWJpIiRzbKtTR2N68nZy7DI17/ywjq4= X-Sasl-enc: Dh7w+nXNt57LCb9VX/vm/aU5u4DBXS+nSdBczTByFn5B 1449220060 Original-Received: from blueberry (89-156-196-194.rev.numericable.fr [89.156.196.194]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 69BBBC01720; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 04:07:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195862 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Richard Stallman writes: > > Richard, minimizing the use of JS code doesn't look like a viable option > > in 2015. > > You can try to convince me, but since most of gnu.org uses no JS code > at all, I am very skeptical. I'm willing to listen to your arguments, > but in the mean time this is our policy. We can talk about this, but I think this is off-topic, I'll send you an email off-list. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYVfaAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQmhIH/Rlec4C8hj2eO96Cntev3qw8 lZGvP4BHKTazVjMfKhyG0mDNfpoM8Jc2IVJKdOjjR/LMeqSdzOKkaslS2iO0hltj jsbz9FMOnkm8T/UaMtr7UamSaM95nHIgh9ztiny2VV4w1nL3QyxGH1movi9noi/R np5+Yf6oK6+xiEn32ZVD7HLhQsIQJtnp7mtOPvs9EihW+L2i+C1g3EASrEPF4k4+ oUYYWrdMsN3iN9BZYCYQXdphkRWsdjaLxz5dNNsSDgIJZKir1I17VC0e9j5PYtQW R3SPpdJol0G1rD6zgoVbsbuM9eFyWk1WZPfCsmL/H6gBxrK3NnWTpurXJMbH8gM= =bFSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--