From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 4K Bugs Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:42:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87egdrqh2x.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87mvszdp6b.fsf@gnus.org> <8737u9kv6f.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878u40ibuu.fsf@gmx.de> <877fjkb41b.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87y4c0gpqx.fsf@gmx.de> <87io349na6.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452328997 22930 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 08:43:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Phillip Lord To: Andrew Hyatt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 09:43:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHp75-00023d-4U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:43:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHp74-0002rF-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 03:43:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHp6r-0002r7-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 03:42:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHp6o-0008Pn-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 03:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:53388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHp6o-0008Pj-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 03:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.3.139]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLB89-1aI6Dx0b5t-000ILW; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:42:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Hyatt's message of "Sat, 09 Jan 2016 04:21:32 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YTgAWS9D1M/yns3yCzjZMfmXdGB7w2K0ODdl5m0OOQ3+bg1WAf5 CzsTpZUOeDnYDd1x4OQIigf5pOz/bfxVbuNGVzl+F4QbDhfaJ+pYgtmN9SOhREZLmjMkJyv fEhx+RCVt91k1lqyKw78QeY4BjGihH3pPBoenIBc+GnM+UAZVQtItXXvpDzvV+PsHKZeKkF Wh3984EIY3B95tcUKguBA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:7YBNvJ8dTPg=:2lfwi7y7KAaVnGzdlE0AgR dMO4awqOrRFp0KUUeFUDAD+FwpCJjmuiACTCQ6waFH/25+TmMn0HeCsUcKT2e7F25R0/PMl/J l64BKPqfeRJVg73a2y+Et0t4GQCOxxJ7ek18nsHyXgWb4ObcFWvhiqkQZnzQV3KGH2mpQie9o mtxJXEJ9UJDLXaxb6qGf+xJbFVSbp7qGbn6EFmUZqxN8sA2D9BksncthgcCRHKT1sc1A0qhxM bGQsg55A9pvgMgYIoUc9Z5zSwWBrBIyppntPq35UPPDtp9VVXeeCKMZ+HZC5USkDl/4MscYgC JOErKLaGKNzZ00aU4J3reNlNZcT0r1Ibrxb7HZTeDJNGad9GHLb2SLDefq5DPbVrVCllIUdqb 2y0ry4AnhFuUlXAXGg/geqs4sV5OS5S/ljyF+DddH0z168DZe1NVytuP1Zc7WbFrkivS18L/5 CSfUJ3uMSyCHV1lOH73SgH5+K9K+rxCelKhou5IF6dV8Y2xrJD0ZbBJ5OY6mji38DsbchXZeB xhcfZNUMSlJ3XK+0yQMlOGsoOEsEqiH/L2gjtEKL/hWu2GS1RdeignMo+NuPIzdAQivrUcE8j uu768K+5b9Pxtw75pGWVAQwXQzGPS/a1ipSGZtyyjgqJnK41uiRtnhT8f76JPIRaNf1E3YPjH wp6BxzICin2mNmtZEm5zLQlVpzwu3yjnfJX9a6rbHnmlw+q388KgfurAzeminftrlRl/WQaCy CtlOqDBLtwU7DG0wNUL1BeXKUg3Mf7aT7/tAEQ+3RPEuzCuKt9Hp3QQpMhSTbKXMblTt3tXf X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197890 Archived-At: Andrew Hyatt writes: Hi Andrew, > FWIW, I found debbugs-org to be a bit buggy after I entered control > messages for what I thought was the bug under the cursor only to find > it sent control messages to a completely different bug. I'll... uh... > file a bug on it or perhaps just fix it once I can reproduce it again. Do you use the git checkout of debbugs? Note that I concentrate these days on debbugs.el and debbugs-gnu.el. It might be that debbugs-org.el is a little bit outdated in the repo. Will fix it before releasing 0.9. > >> One document which I think is missing is a "what all the tags" > mean. > > > > I believe it is covered in the User Guide. If not sufficient, > ask for > > clarification. > > invalid? Different from notabug, wontfix, unreproducible? > > pending? Pending what? Different from moreinfo? > > patch? It includes one? Covers a bug report with a pull request? Emacs has no special meaning on them. Check the debbugs doc: "invalid" is declared in debbugs-*.el only. It sets the tags notabug and wontfix, and closes the bug. See the User Guide. > And important, minor, normal, serious, wishlist. Is serious more > important than important? Or Important more serious than serious? > What > criterion? > Pretty sure it must go, in order of decreasing severity: serious, > important, normal. Sure. > Serious probably is reserved for things like emacs > crashing bugs, security vulnerabilities and the like. I don't know > whether there is a rule about this, but I'd guess that new emacs > versions shouldn't be released if any serious bugs are opened against > it. Important is a bit unknown to me, I'm guessing just a bit scarier > than the "normal" bugs. We don't use critical and grave, 'tho. > security? valid only for bugs? or wishlists, RFE also? No rule exist yet. > Great questions, and once someone sheds light on the things like > invalid and pending (I have no clue, personally), I'll write up the > info in the bug-triage file. > Phil Best regards, Michael.