From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix conv_lisp_to_sockaddr for AF_INET6 addresses Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:29:13 +1100 Message-ID: <87egco56s6.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454895009 22907 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 01:30:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:30:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 02:30:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSaeL-0001Jt-C1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 02:29:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39911 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSaeK-0001t4-LG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSae7-0001sf-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSae4-0005RA-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSae4-0005R6-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:29:40 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aSadi-0000vz-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 02:29:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Sun, 07 Feb 2016 12:52:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aSadi-0000vz-1C MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455499759.24164@HagGlt5oxK57U6aYxZrniw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199474 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > 2. We need a suite of tests for this feature, because it makes a rather > fundamental change, and I'd like some coverage to ensure that others > working in similar areas won't break it in future. Sure. Network tests have to be done locally though, right? I don't think we have the infrastructure to set up a TLS server in Emacs, so that part is kinda hard to test, but there's a lot of other tests we can do with Emacs as both server and client, of course. If we were to have tests that connected to real servers out there, that would be even more realistic, but would be fragile, and not kind to those servers, I guess. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no