From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Amin Bandali Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:08:25 -0400 Organization: GNU Message-ID: <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="85008"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 22 16:09:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2Do-000Ly0-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:09:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2Dn-00074L-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2DD-0006EZ-W9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2DD-0006i6-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [2607:fea8:3fe0:17d::8] (port=41564 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2DD-0000f5-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:08:27 -0400 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245671 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello, I may be in the minority, but... Alan Mackenzie writes: [...] > > Still, an increase of ~75% in processing time over the best part of a > decade isn't that bad. Surely? Certainly not when compared with the > increase in available computing power. > [...] Just as a data point, my main machine is a ThinkPad released in 2008 with a Core 2 Duo processor, which is not nearly as fast as the newer Core i5/i7 processors found in more recent machines since. That is not to say I don't enjoy and appreciate useful new features in GNU Emacs, but rather that I think we should keep a close eye on the performance penalties accumulated over time and (continue) trying to minimize them as much as we can. :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEObM8jZRIDS3cwqSYi0Sgzce5VvIFAl53f2oACgkQi0Sgzce5 VvJacg//Y7WwMBUBVC7wgPeHc0UkVseMdWWgDrHmzdKOvhmPmARrOB07bzYICnyb HLbv5fAWNvhkCMoqk3PGzQpnzd9O6l/udjn15P+tXfG7+Ea6qKvH8c1lTlYQkmxh zN8K+5MD5MMsKYAlMwM1Nu+BU7NUFWnCsii10O4csEz4ErzI6Kj5Jgr/r5ckKG+q 0Jb+iFAlsdBWqv8o4Hh5ZSwGLyVzU3HGLRNNQ14vU9BELMA4lCNRAFK5iZDhzZCd AmkNOCWgIkCwkz51VKC0nccGLXkSnpw5w0+QA+scomcnDW9ma2visp4vfeRFyZUG +Iu57+54doSeAtU3hDi2/5DTxSlkXXObgYdJl8GaujRbVHh4qKSMrxhO0KIE4aIy ODWQb6GzwxpXBQ3tdA5NycFov/8VXB2htqVbzFHVRe4jPJt2foo0kp/9CRxIQo7I cU4o/RVOlpi4/DsgGu/0YvuFC/Wj0XjYI0TqRMH9R5dBjgnu3siYsX4K2o+L2P8m NVz8KErbnplXeNRq7ZCdNF46U1zet+KwwumQfjm7JG839RNUlLwGLhHIeUQmrwKk 6mu3SxOGfPIo9A6JknL1xv/B1QzUcwcF67Tdd4simghUmgYAFF0Tv5+6CAsdivF/ v5CVZR1YJR+E8wwc9hvRr+ZIINb7WdDlqG0qBuabHul5KDj/Y+g= =DDsV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--