From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New feature in project.el: Remembering the previously used projects Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:28:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeqw2xsk.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87wo4tn2ap.fsf@warpmail.net> <5ed68784.1c69fb81.61518.35eeSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="71580"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Philip K." , dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Simen =?utf-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 13:29:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgRaB-000IYI-7q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 13:29:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgRaA-00013h-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 07:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgRZh-0000b0-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 07:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:36600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgRZg-0006ww-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 07:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id d128so1654275wmc.1 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 04:28:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ENe3mix0puJtBWNmezBqVuWGi6XS6RHDArmS+MIBR8A=; b=gMV6Da1sxfLgkcSE8kbacU2GucqMhq7mvRQBwEwlKKhQlPKgbuQSpUXhpS0O/ws+l3 2Dkc3ua7tTh4mQnU8yVtz+2lh5YdCo9gn6JZUm4t2ag0Zk56j1XQsvjfcgsg38LH5M3v rDB6VK9IRO0UpwFcHHXfyd8vUMoXEbqrML6DIIM4jMen+9JXy/0vh0lyRRfJtoOWnuGz 2I3MWNVp61HylgXn26rm1dUVxJuQ0kd4uBHF3QFW3TvZ3M5fbM/r4HOC30fJvPSZY1n7 EyvIfrB+9C5EHX5+BSeL7gJTPcXbY1m7mHyXeAVtlOoXO5GiEMSduJ5Iz7BLShYeKeLG wsWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ENe3mix0puJtBWNmezBqVuWGi6XS6RHDArmS+MIBR8A=; b=GAZ1KQPKFs4ezt+OH7MTGZ+EV0639fWvOmJG669KStVzB3IWUaY7Xw5QEMjAQ8CHns Uy14Vcy6eKPiE975k0KhOhuttjVnQOTULoUFe7FRXDJ1Fu3oNl902005CXokjWhy/lA0 9BCNtkpWAwYuH2zeRNAB+4m4DnwAlspgGvi91gSRzY5VAddz3UGUuxiHgwzxylv70Rp8 0o3VECRDXTp6d0W653C/8aXynN95z5+Kq7geGZ/pAFzocv4FdFv/HrAp5GTXDnNa6OE+ jbKeIiWCCMbj0O+OGQ+WEFBMe5QLv4GRDcEa4rs6MSoKwxMNHODgmghkJCfAdKqx8VeO CfJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FcUp0mxxU6J+0kV84K1TGKs5fr6u1IsSiMKDSWNzCWBpuGv6J JW9N6C1g+05d2di2do/1V78hxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPbW5ds3PWcQpQZ0LEJsxOdxfy7KVuwRF6uevSdXbsHldQphXtXeuHXF4GuIemQxmH1X/wRg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2643:: with SMTP id m64mr8143955wmm.158.1591183726215; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 04:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:1f68:7ff5:120d:64e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c65sm2631962wme.8.2020.06.03.04.28.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jun 2020 04:28:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5ed68784.1c69fb81.61518.35eeSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> ("Simen =?utf-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl=22's?= message of "Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:04:52 +0200") Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32b; envelope-from=contovob@tcd.ie; helo=mail-wm1-x32b.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251793 Archived-At: Simen Heggest=C3=B8yl writes: > "Philip K." writes: > >> I would have prefered read-multiple-choice, because the function is >> more extensive than "just" a key-reading-loop, and seems to catch more >> edge-cases. > > Me too. The only gripe I (and Dmitry) had with it was that we preferred > the layout of the current interface. For me it's because I find it hard > to distinguish the bold letters used by read-multiple-choice. Would it > be an option to change read-multiple-choice's prompt to use brackets to > distinguish key choices instead? If more people prefer it, making it the > default, or if not, at least adding it as an option? In that case I > wouldn't hesitate to change project-switch-project to use > read-multiple-choice. +1 for making read-multiple-choice more flexible (and robust ;). --=20 Basil