From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/dll-only-windows] A new windows build, comments wanted Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:36:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeit23ob.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87pn2dq3xv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ft39hnk1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32913"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:s3Sg2ZRKaB7wORXNgiuvZjHzlZs= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 22:37:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLvC-0008TC-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:37:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLvB-0003iI-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLuf-0003ET-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:41572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLud-0004VX-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLua-0007rD-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:36:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262821 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Before I fix this, I think it is worth asking whether I still need >> to produce a i686 binary. > > I cannot tell you what to do, but it would be nice to have binaries > that can be run on older Windows versions. So if the build supports > XP and older Windows, keeping the 32-bit build would be an advantage. MSYS2 MinGW-w64 binaries do not support XP, they officially decided this some years ago and now some runtime dlls use APIs not present on XP.