From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:51:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87eehaokrd.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1laomak.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn0uzubj.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6molnq.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8geztvt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 15:54:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDTeV-00018i-EW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:54:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33970 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDTeU-0005WA-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDTbT-000238-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:33966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDTbQ-0004pR-U2; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:51:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3pt7/jsrCupvkVfZtS7KBXAv3ufImxGxWyJg1ShAlC4=; b=hJcKO37me9D5p02BEDv/s0WLmA /q/HtW+7W9qlLJsw7jrMKvVIuz9/TzlYfpmx/kzXj9YfWVbnJjwVOpm9oYYueG57X0Dg5+JfHHxot vN8d4hxtFIYF8VN7Wqe8FT/9x8oHKbOldxrjCTB2JWGPs5r7vgwuxbGHmWLgncH8MEeY=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDTbL-0006qU-Nz; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:51:22 +0100 X-Now-Playing: White Heaven's _Levitation_: "Dull Hands -remastered edition 2021-" In-Reply-To: <83o8geztvt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:38:46 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265320 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I've now tried this new command. > > emacs -Q > M-S-x > > This shows "M-x" prompt, whereas I expected either "M-X" or "M-S-x". Ah, yes, that should be fixed... > TAB > > This shows the following *help* buffer: > > Click on a completion to select it. > In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point. > > Possible completions are: > backward-delete-char-untabify (DEL) completion-at-point (C-M-i) > edebug-defun (edebug-eval-top-level-form) > eval-defun (C-M-x) eval-print-last-sexp (C-j) > indent-pp-sexp (C-M-q) > > That's it. All of it. Is that the intent? Yup. Well, `lisp-interaction-mode' hasn't been tagged up, so you're basically getting `C-h m' in `M-x'-like form. I'm not sure `M-S-x' in the *scratch* buffer will ever include more than that, but this command is (well, will be) more useful for command discovery in more specialised modes. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no