From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrei Kuznetsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:27:43 +0800 Message-ID: <87eebish4g.fsf@163.com> References: <8735rzyzbz.fsf@163.com> <86v94v3xh9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87o8amy88o.fsf@163.com> <20210728123612.pr2ddrf6vmynknxn@Ergus> <877dhawpr7.fsf@163.com> <83mtq6tw7v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27411"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: spacibba@aol.com, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 15:28:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jc5-0006xQ-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:28:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jc3-0003SS-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jbN-0001v8-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from m12-18.163.com ([220.181.12.18]:55696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jbH-0000Kh-2u; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:27:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=btVg1 DZ/YIEiyNF0k8ssBWpwuWo+E/YN7vG7Gm5zPOM=; b=el4F2YR/U1jLxuamc05g2 SMdqh75gCvD87R8kn8EB2BysY5oUigziOc+btyKPQAAZMaRJ1jg150iDC7+MIzyr otri6ojdXanQgBnJQa2G1KtGVfZQQW3MU7UFKHqYBtTrCKQjdkrguGvT6ASKLROt pUzz0JTlvT8GOUnCYck3us= Original-Received: from po-lus-librem-15 (unknown [61.172.31.87]) by smtp14 (Coremail) with SMTP id EsCowAAHC8tPWwFhE7LWww--.62110S2; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:27:44 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <83mtq6tw7v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:16:20 +0300") X-CM-TRANSID: EsCowAAHC8tPWwFhE7LWww--.62110S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUIaZXUUUUU X-Originating-IP: [61.172.31.87] X-CM-SenderInfo: rurskkarusmjiyx6il2tof0z/1tbiDxDdpFUMY8ss0wAAso Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.181.12.18; envelope-from=r12451428287@163.com; helo=m12-18.163.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_HEX=0.006, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271739 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> While tree-sitter may be nice and all, it doesn't seem to offer the >> usual extensibility expected from Emacs. > Which extensibility did you have in mind that TS doesn't support? Let us assume that a generated TS grammar contains a (C) function akin to `semantic-lex-unterminated-syntax-detected', and I wish to achieve similar results to binding `semantic-lex-unterminated-syntax-end-function' to a function of my choice. Would that be possible?