From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] New tab-bar-detach-tab command Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 19:38:07 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87ee8z5swg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87h7e4ikkz.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87pmsrrh7y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875yujizgi.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87o88bb21y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871r57i2cz.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87k0iu6n6x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lf388zo5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r1d0woq1.fsf@alphapapa.net> <878rz8aruo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6jovt2e.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35422"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 19:38:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXoOI-00095e-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 19:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXoOH-00045w-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnoV-0001IT-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:60579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnoT-0006yk-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 344CB240012; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:01:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a6jovt2e.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2021 02:17:45 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.230; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay10.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276352 Archived-At: >> The command was named "duplicate" because web browsers >> provide the menu item "Duplicate tab". > > Of course, that makes sense. But since "clone" seems to already be a > term used in Emacs for this sort of thing, maybe we should consider > using it, instead. Maybe there is no problem when the command name will contain the word "clone", but its menu item will be like in web browsers: `(menu-item "Duplicate" (lambda () (interactive) (tab-bar-clone-tab And wouldn't it be too error-prone when the name 'tab-bar-clone-tab' will differ only by one letter from another name 'tab-bar-close-tab'? > For example, `clone-buffer' and `clone-process' both > "Create a twin copy of...". 'tab-duplicate' is bound to 'C-x t n' and not to 'C-x t c' because 'clone-buffer' is bound to 'C-x x n' and not 'C-x x c'.