From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Naming FCRs Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:33:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87ee5v4bgt.fsf@gnus.org> References: <25033.3311.820141.174735@orion.rgrjr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bob Rogers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 29 17:35:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2buq-0008xE-UI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:35:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2bup-0002vA-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2btt-0002En-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=33280 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2btr-0003sR-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:34:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Aj/ydHwwpEPPRQjNdXuSwywkkP+n/jKNdvnS9n7l6aA=; b=GEHAUXxfjxKnFMZYAjmfL5y6dq C0pTMnZVhIo0eno9PBv7Gzmnccrj31wIr+s2NsaMH3ZdbZohypxRk4VmV0QpfH35CQWI0zIhsfC96 HdREBdmC5VCw1fzi9o5D0w3oa5rhRpdaYTYsisTCO9SRTSCAi3bHRyfYxlL/98LigzTM=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2btl-0007e8-At; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:33:59 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAHlBMVEX0vDD7xDTNni2z jS2Nby5YRSJZUE9lWlKzsrH///8JT23mAAAAAWJLR0QJ8dml7AAAAAd0SU1FB+UMHRAhHodoySIA AAGmSURBVDjLdZLBUsIwEIZ3g9x3qw/QJs54hSCcGRXuCugdMblzSN/A4bHdBGibUgOTdvbrn393 /gAAIDPHBwHIHzitczm+YFFyZ10/YAKtcQiwsmYQFNrqoaNI5ydFQOmprbSUAeI3YqVnOqtHxeOW CjvTCNQ1AVTb1cSAxSiruor5+4dWtiQU/y4Yr3ZbrbTBXl9QbF53LzMzq6ReZh52vqu0sXpiymxy tdoJUEZQPuDYbpYkYxib1QWMlhKCsaakHNxvUcIxuswHF/MYHowmmNdTVZaqAPsAieLWq58zBwC4 BdFnGBCq9tZ0ARbrKcGtOai1O9weJoLVZ3BH6hOwEJzzvorhZ8A8O1nhWyJnzI+6c15+xzQmNzIg orWT09y0ud7nXfJ/EIFz39gzl20dbdwyc4cRR0lc0plkgh0F4SKRPaUI8HyZpylGd/G/3H66AMYn 8Q/1oeMPy/Qoggu+DsemjqkrTlPWofZV3m48Vab88fW+BddvpGWRhEbSBrfwp18fGvc2hMKdan/g WwU/ff2G/RAQf1cNAX7wrSADvJj+A4rO+x8Ynnbz2HAz3wAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy MS0xMi0yOVQxNjozMzozMCswMDowMMKQRdYAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMTItMjlU MTY6MzM6MzArMDA6MDCzzf1qAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Hot Chip's _Coming on Strong_: "The Beach Party" In-Reply-To: <25033.3311.820141.174735@orion.rgrjr.com> (Bob Rogers's message of "Sun, 26 Dec 2021 19:46:39 -0500") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283572 Archived-At: Bob Rogers writes: > Without looking at the code, this sounds more like a closure to me. > Since the slots are accessible outside the function, that would make it > a "transparent closure" . . . but I like the internal dissonance of > "open closure" better. ;-} "Open closure" gets my vote. =F0=9F=99=83 --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no