From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] EUDC email addresses via completion-at-point in message-mode Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:04:41 +0100 Organization: On the Interweb somewhere Message-ID: <87ee1z4xzq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87o814wi9l.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37837"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:KJZ5U793QlHHXULdq1xVeCOQ6uI= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 14 15:07:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nezCP-0009Zf-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:07:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nezCO-0007Jt-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nez9l-00054i-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:58248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nez9j-00059h-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nez9i-0005pg-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:05:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Url: http://twitter.com/ericsfraga/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288386 Archived-At: On Wednesday, 13 Apr 2022 at 18:44, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > I do what I assume anyone else would do: clobber the binding of TAB > altogether. But then you use the functionality provided by message-tab when composing the actual body of the email? This is more important to me than address completion, if I had to choose... but obviously would like to have TAB complete appropriately wherever I am in the massage buffer! -- Eric S Fraga with org 9.5.2 in Emacs 29.0.50 on Debian 11.3