From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Deprecation of define-key? Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:11:30 +0000 Message-ID: <87edxzc5v1.fsf@posteo.net> References: <875yjgszm4.fsf@posteo.net> <87mtcr99mx.fsf@igel.home> <871qu2lt68.fsf@fau.de> <87sfmizump.fsf@gnus.org> <871qtzou8e.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnbr0xt1.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Augusto Stoffel , Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 12:40:58 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpKc-0004CL-5k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:40:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50802 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpKb-0004SG-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 06:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIosB-0007Xr-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 06:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:57431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIos9-0002ny-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 06:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B385240026 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:11:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1659435091; bh=4qTOXq0vWTVcOtonvI/Ju0NyXIeNwXMCJnSlviz/QiM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=as9zsoLn168aAt2KZwxmCp8tQB/ldm3w2HPmMISDP8tHPTIddHmYEN0RGzf3u6Mju HPN04SMEr8LZHVoIhFYI9zCSB6ftqEwKt0agIJg9VceBKnKbufrV8IzQYAik3W71Lv 3qdhW4fTmTMqzYhfilNbgBBAmkw8gwnaMu59XvxwLJOckTW3J+nLQzzY3aD3e4GFuQ jYPWkkZYx18aYwX6u/NX2EI8VgJ6mcmo1s1AzEUUgudnUd6WWXBGI9te6eIN9Df5Q+ lsTdjPSYl7uKEc+XdEo0ZURUV+UoMwv3/cuOTTXaqCA8vWmMl7ypZwZU64l2qKv1EM rlpZecJ82RuSw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4LxrPG4Jgkz9rxB; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:11:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wnbr0xt1.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:00:58 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292984 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Augusto Stoffel writes: > >> Wouldn't it make sense to let keymap-set take multiple key-definition >> pairs as arguments, like setq et al? This would be very convenient >> e.g. in user configuration files, where currently one often finds long >> sequences of define-key calls. This looks much better to me: >> >> (keymap-set some-map >> "a" 'command-a >> "b" 'command-b >> "c" 'command-c) > > I think that makes sense, and we'd just have to extend the definition > from > > (keymap-set KEYMAP KEY DEFINITION) > > to > > (keymap-set KEYMAP KEY DEFINITION &rest PAIRS) > > But how should the indentation be? It's not a definition form, so > indenting it like the above would be unusual. Why should this kind of indentation only be used for definition forms? I wouldn't consider `progn', `pcase', or `cl-callf' definitions, and they all have the `lisp-indent-function' property set. I believe the indentation that Augusto suggested is perfectly reasonable.