From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions regarding PGTK, high-dpi font-rendering, new X11-Warning Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:44:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87edtncvss.fsf@thaodan.de> References: <87cz99l4td.fsf@thaodan.de> <87v8n1w7cf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wn7gc53k.fsf@thaodan.de> <87r0xnx4fs.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 09:45:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZlm-0001Ol-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:45:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZl7-0002GD-3a; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZl5-0002Fr-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from thaodan.de ([2a03:4000:4f:f15::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZl2-0006SA-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from odin (dsl-trebng12-b04885-76.dhcp.inet.fi [176.72.133.76]) by thaodan.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 238A4D02507; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:44:53 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=thaodan.de; s=mail; t=1669625093; bh=Wthrz1K1Hw98+s4j4+w9BWTPIylZscVSr6gHWJ65TPQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cq3YBuLKSJih9Kxo995mXK3ez7PtJMjTxPqaQRRPr9DI3myVd6AoaG52yWAh3Q7Dl NLAk51/fP7bD35TFUbh7MICnsh717dvi8tCbjN63q+PgC7c53Ce/w5kGRn/NBjjujq vd6Uvc4rkloymJeMMyyWsIJzrk4Mjuhvf/yQu63SqgfjLutogjqM9vEbK8NzF+yCxF J2wx8Xb1N80PqlugCwwJhTJwG5xXctHez67ZFBhiscsaO2bD6unUmbDl7v71dxjAqe Bntqgz0RDigBehFxNQJ/UYi3tyJpSCw3i6Eij6Cs7VNL+dImAAWSjBw4GQfkH4qQhD hppIq83JyxXPZtRPRJQus1EuWWrmNU+raXyHfAOqbu5HiqFunfUiives/BoSO6n12M B6nQJ7DTFg7k0qiw52QjEEZ2yv1bG/20jgd998iLC+UfXAMLU1lReQepjM7mEoHInO sN90sWNxH1oAfybtuL+FtiMBKNccOI9PjQVdybr7K8UZd27huaCHQ9cJQsRxyOAyWt AjFbu8GsrQ+nMrJvglaot0b5giFqAMLZYKoMkJ4Mt1CJWIaQv+ZbjVd3fIsdjiTAEn 2rzx/HCCbq83cpIwXxjzCSE2Fv80FxV4ZJUXDmqQfFfAhHYYBSxOyH4N2tzWYfDs0m tXxSNxfD0v8RrCF/+VhYA53c= In-Reply-To: <87r0xnx4fs.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:17:59 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a03:4000:4f:f15::1; envelope-from=bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de; helo=thaodan.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300664 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Bj=C3=B6rn Bidar writes: > >> It didn't crash before.. > > As a result of not crashing, the clipboard did not work well either. Which clipboard issues? It's working just fine for me. >> Or make it run as good as it can under X11 and leave the rest of the >> remaining issues as work as intended until a fix is found > > Why? There is already a perfectly good X build, so doing so would be a > waste of our energy. Why two Emacs binaries? >> Emacs might to something strange with GTK then, it is the only program >> having these issues. >> >> So far I didn't experience such issues. > > Emacs uses more low level mechanisms in GTK compared to most other > programs, but there is nothing wrong with how it uses them. The GTK devs probably disagree wit that. Br, Bj=C3=B6rn