From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Org mode update breaking build? Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 21:02:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87ednxut4y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <00b52cc1-b0ac-a0c0-c91d-33a7213e9881@web.de> <83y1m5l7ur.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.11.4; emacs 30.0.50 Cc: Tobias Bading , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 21:12:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puHtf-0009HS-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 21:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puHtW-0000AI-IA; Wed, 03 May 2023 15:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puHtU-00009p-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 15:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puHtU-0000np-2L; Wed, 03 May 2023 15:12:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From: References; bh=hq4RFE7zOuJct4ZpARHGVcfLoxm/RF26ZjlFpYjKt0k=; b=mw7LM/a7oyAYbH xxNIkO+VI6UeSzKHcCHCBD87QmhyKxzrrWmEhtG5i6NW7Znnl1jp1N10zrwAdStW8P9slBG4zHU5L c1WYOKnssPyhqzd75xP6zOLxazNWWEv9Mg3SKQ0ot1I/ZHVlPiu1YoeV7W6rdRFom/4ytC0BL5gcR 7RJCtZIASFqPg5yk+MpEJZAsoBsvDcUdoSGI0bpwe5Opek+TYqEzCOJnV38pJb++5vPUD7fP+apZW 21AeZeP2UaCAAYDGoivwYPlBRHtV4UDca2j4IoQhBNjr2mVEsivR+hX0EmX4xE9BwEzMWtKboz+51 ErsJONi6AAZ0IU1KTOYA==; Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puHtT-0006GM-Jw; Wed, 03 May 2023 15:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654AA27C005C; Wed, 3 May 2023 15:12:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 May 2023 15:12:01 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfedvkedgudefudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpehffgfhvfevufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghs shhilhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epudejtdehuddvleffjeekteegvdehleehvdeufefhueekkeekhedvgfeggeffvefgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnh domhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeeh vdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ib2b94485:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 3 May 2023 15:11:59 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <83y1m5l7ur.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305802 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > There's a solution on master, and an improvement on that solution in > the works, Is the solution commit 62e4eb8fcf7? This commit is a week old but I would swear oath that I've had this org version mismatch error yesterday (or maybe two days ago?) on two different machines following the master branch. On both of them I update my emacs (almost) every morning. If my memory is correct and I get the error again, what information should I collect and attach to Bug#62762? Bye, Tassilo