From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of bug tracker Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 08:23:42 +0000 Message-ID: <87edjiti7l.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm37ie54.fsf@gnu.org> <831qfmhyx3.fsf@gnu.org> <245de638-e6b2-dd8e-ee61-695c4c3da0c7@gutov.dev> <83h6oghixu.fsf@gnu.org> <6ae0b4b0-b2ef-d8de-caed-d647979c2f37@gutov.dev> <83ttsfel30.fsf@gnu.org> <8f500cee-f136-fdc6-aaa5-960bbeceeaae@gutov.dev> <874jketjbc.fsf@hugot.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Michael Albinus , philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Hugo Thunnissen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 10:24:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbzRy-0001Ut-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:24:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbzQz-0008Hq-82; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 04:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbzQx-0008HJ-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 04:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbzQu-0002RX-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 04:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07098240028 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:23:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693556590; bh=0OaYILWJfxbpmlJ8iZN9U8NG7X6GDz1o+/6WQdXIQtQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=rdTiD47Z7rLvua0zVVYQI8z0oxJeG/gPFQlm/o60pWfQXFJBIlXxjTJlRwvWKOFgI REcNmXi9gkahngTrRo1iWhKtBhV+8T+tC7/loBuHz4DQglXOimrjzT3CYp5qdcqp7A /VLhtSBXKPoPMM5G97zwqFEzPupOPt1uyHb8CysO/qG/PJzRndE5aDmlYSS4gCum5q gSI92iXP31bVJk3PcIkFksgR25BF6e/+naeGi0vi2dWrFX/jJE3F51KYrn3WRT9jHr 9e7OkSv3fDlf7WsoP7aUx2l0xP2tnjs5ZuvDa8HdKGeiLKAdkYejk2VM3SEUvDRe30 RaIGQt4tOES+A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RcWHw5PQ1z6txG; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:23:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <874jketjbc.fsf@hugot.nl> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309732 Archived-At: Hugo Thunnissen writes: > PS: I'm a little surprised that sourcehut is not receiving more love > here. Looking at sourcehut it seems to be the only forge where email > based developmen is a first-class citizen. It's also the only forge that > is licensed under the GPL and whose developers politically align with > the FSF. It seems to me that a better fit for the emacs project doesn't > exist. Yes, but they are even more conservative about email-driven and patch-driven workflows. For example, they are against html emails. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at