From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Permanently fix org versioning breakage during builds? Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:24:23 +0000 Message-ID: <87edfb1k0o.fsf@localhost> References: <25989.50971.995591.385250@google.com> <87a5q0dc9m.fsf@localhost> <87y1djc1c9.fsf@localhost> <87zfxzdbna.fsf@yahoo.com> <87plyv7oii.fsf@localhost> <8734vr4prv.fsf@localhost> <835y0nd4ut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxz35b4.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14798"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , luangruo@yahoo.com, raman@google.com, joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 24 20:21:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rHU2j-0003cY-QR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 20:21:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHU2O-0001FG-5k; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 14:21:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHU2K-0001Bd-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 14:21:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHU2I-0004MC-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 14:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99D9240101 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 20:21:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1703445675; bh=g5Qxy31K7hoSEfVOf0o8jvhg/j/pBpcmtrrLTjEZ/aQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=Xd7rmddMOBYO0YfaSBwnZiUQ8qJUMAoeoMb1kzgpdnr98nwByKP2NIWVt7MZ+wwQq ceZDfGn/CCRwR1fKTxThjEdYTdMGEGpFdL1EwTE8QwHv48AV+4oS7+QqPl8ym8vu80 W7rrS7by/biR9SMC6L+OM2OYD22Z8x/6174LArylNEjDkXLDyuCQRkYP8ChcnYSRqh tVRbtCUey6URsfunBVLqp5szZ8Ow/wNP7t55I9SrNC4fJ0EZkdol2hVc3jjDWB7/01 hqAV5IoTdCUQRwWHGhi5qgVdb1QjpZ8vsKfv/W0583x2pG8AqlNxb3EBa0ig1xwo7E 8Cs8sgSX9VbyA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4SyrVg10Dzz9rxG; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 20:21:15 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314189 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Since we release a new minor Org version every few weeks, the breakage >> happens every few weeks. > > Would it make sense to make `org-assert-version' less strict on master? > It might not be necessary to require bootstrap for every single bug fix > release, but I can see how it might be helpful for larger bumps. > > Would that make sense? I'm not terribly close to the problem, since I > bootstrap pretty often and only run from master. I thought about it (to compare only major+minor versions), but bugfix releases sometimes contain critical fixes. So, it might not be ideal. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at