Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>]

> This will be a consensus based project. Conflicts are not
> allowed, public dismissiveness of people efforts or
> backgrounds isn't either, the worst thing anyone is allowed
> to say is "we need to work more on this".

If people really, really insist on one guy in charge then
I'm not 100% against it but then ... find someone we are sure
of isn't in it for the power at all.

Some nerdy/intellectual guy who has been active with his stuff
and been talking on the MLs optimally so we know him.

Because if he does "meaningless things", that only he (or she)
is into, then we know, okay, he is into that, he didn't come
here for any other reason.

Because people who are into power - avoid, avoid, avoid.
And they are much more common than I would have ever thought!
And they are everywhere, literally, including places where you
would be like "who would ever, ever care one bit who is in
charge HERE". But not only do these people care, that was the
reason they came. Yes, it is scary.

Well, I'm sure you guys solve this in a good way.

Ah, man, I'm too tired, that is why I write so long about
everything. See you ... zzz

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal