From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:15:33 +0000 Message-ID: <87ed57swlm.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87wmj7dftf.fsf@posteo.net> <87setvxyt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzf7o13b.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk3jr0u.fsf@gmail.com> <87setum5do.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk1520e.fsf@gmail.com> <87settknf1.fsf@posteo.net> <87tte8akwa.fsf@gmail.com> <878qvjaep6.fsf@posteo.net> <87cykvwixn.fsf@gmail.com> <8734lodjjv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Martin =?utf-8?Q?Edstr=C3=B6m?= , "emacs-devel" , Tony Zorman To: Suhail Singh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 25 15:16:58 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1stRt4-0004R3-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:16:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stRs6-0002SV-Jc; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stRrr-0002RT-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stRrn-0002Dh-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA787240101 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:15:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1727270135; bh=eFidbyG1ND0D0SjahSkxJBAt3dpHRj+Xoe/GYDrH6Ow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=Vvg15YsqgB0+RPeSPYsx2cc/xENFEQaALvgM2oVSKPDV/XeM8/49xPjr3F3mIzqR0 QXVBCOw60Zjytzn2eTSWSp0JZkNQLjQf4JcI8o7ty8R/evyFBWsWpyo4/VU71zjyKk 2+KFAttMli/8WgwiDHHR4vE/SdQi2NaWv7oHCDNboBu5gSOgDWdGpKkLE0x31EUoGl V6kz9vAfA5COxDh5edIHJlbtES7fr9mBBjMCqq6KQ8RDAMex04Td+yGC5fZ2HTqSBn nox4rqR8DC5pOC1meEOg5tLZ/v7m2bEND2/Vh0DLWH0tZJ62jVDIrpCv8jX3RtD6ka mdmjl/xCcfhng== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4XDHKL0kJFz9rxL; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:15:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8734lodjjv.fsf@gmail.com> (Suhail Singh's message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:06:28 -0400") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM OpenPGP: id=philipk@posteo.net; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-email/philipk@posteo.net"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324067 Archived-At: Suhail Singh writes: > Suhail Singh writes: > >>>> #+begin_quote >>>> Since we do not make stable releases (effectively, it is just rolling on >>>> `master`, I think we should just clarify that users should use `melpa`, and if >>>> possible expunge the package from `melpa-stable` etc. >>>> #+end_quote >>>> >>>> [1]: >>> >>> If that is so, then we can also mark the ELPA package as using a >>> rolling-release model, i.e. the build server prepares a new tarball >>> every time is synchronises new commits. >> >> I believe that that would be desirable, and the accurate thing in the >> case of julia-mode. Could you please confirm when that change has been >> made. > > It seems the maintainers are considering switching to semantic > versioning (version 1.0.0 onwards). See > for > details. Please don't switch to a rolling-release model. No problem. >> Additionally, could you please point me to where the "rolling-release >> model" is documented? A search for "rolling" in >> didn't >> yield any matches. > > Regardless, please do share the reference to the documentation when you > get a chance. I think we sent our previous messages just at the same time. But for the sake of anyone following the archives, I'll give the link here again: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/tree/README?h=elpa-admin&id=9bd65395f1d4875915731ddbdd73a471f10d7794#n215 -- Philip Kaludercic on siskin