From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible? Date: 16 Mar 2002 09:56:33 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87d6y5mita.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> References: <200202232019.g1NKJoG14638@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202250510.g1P5A3714156@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202262013.g1QKDef16683@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203010130.g211UDG05790@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203031440.g23EeN200619@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203031711.g23HBI623254@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203042341.g24NfiH00596@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203052158.g25Lw7A01243@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203052304.g25N4pI03908@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203092003.g29K3b303868@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203092237.g29MbGf29464@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203102132.g2ALWPK04119@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203102202.g2AM26q06798@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203111906.g2BJ6BY04591@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203121756.g2CHuG514941@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203131058.g2DAwQh05428@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203150341.g2F3flZ06455@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203160022.g2G0MJ204725@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016240292 2284 127.0.0.1 (16 Mar 2002 00:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , David.Kastrup@t-online.de, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16m2WR-0000ak-00 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:58:11 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16m2ZZ-0007We-00 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:01:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16m2Vf-0008Lm-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:57:23 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp02.fields.gol.com ([203.216.5.132]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16m2V4-0008Jm-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:56:47 -0500 Original-Received: from tc-2-159.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.25.159] helo=tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp) by smtp02.fields.gol.com with esmtp (Magnetic Fields) id 16m2V2-0002kY-00; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:56:45 +0900 Original-Received: by tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8CFB302E; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:56:33 +0900 (JST) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <200203160022.g2G0MJ204725@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 11 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:1949 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1949 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > I'm not completely sure about that. After all, why would someone > put a `display' property on an `invisible' overlay if the `invisible' > property means that the `display' property will be ignored anyway ? Perhaps the properties come from different sources (e.g., one form a text property, one from an overlay)? -Miles -- Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel