From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: java line termination Date: 02 Feb 2003 18:14:30 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87d6matbbd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <874r7txh2g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <877kcnpwyr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <878yx23sej.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044235588 29050 80.91.224.249 (3 Feb 2003 01:26:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18fVNS-0007YQ-00 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 02:26:26 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18fVUp-00019p-00 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 02:34:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18fVNZ-0005Q5-07 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18fVNH-0005Py-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18fVNG-0005PQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.peakpeak.com ([207.174.178.17] helo=gash2.peakpeak.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18fVNE-0005AL-00; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fleche.redhat.com (tz0187.peakpeak.com [207.174.69.187]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA09793; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:26:04 -0700 Original-Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B66A84F8080; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:14:30 -0700 (MST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Is this ANYWHERE, USA? In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11296 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11296 >>>>> "rms" == Richard Stallman writes: rms> The buffer will not be marked as modified right after you visit it; rms> but conversion will have lost information, so if you proceed to edit rms> the buffer and save it, the line breaks will be different. rms> Is that really ok? It isn't ideal, but I think it is acceptable. I think mixed-termination buffers end up that way only by mistake anyway. If I'm editing there, I'll probably want to fix it, and anyway I can justify the change. Tom