From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: image size limit?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:39 -0400
Message-ID: <87d5m3zu20.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <87oe5v7q19.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1EPjP3-0007dR-7H@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87k6giiqh3.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<E1EQ9SF-0007Ve-SF@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87hdbht7v9.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1ERYor-0008Uh-Cs@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129586248 31775 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2005 21:57:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 23:57:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERcyY-0001Ge-0s
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:56:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERcyX-0004YR-Io
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:57 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERcyP-0004YK-Jg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:49 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERcyO-0004Y7-V6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERcyO-0004Y4-RD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [18.95.6.192] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ERcyG-0008FL-FJ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:40 -0400
Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 650A81E42CC; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <E1ERYor-0008Uh-Cs@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard M. Stallman's
	message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:41 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44213
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44213>

> But I don't think this limit should be absolute.  I think it should be
> specified as a multiple of the frame height and width, and it should
> be given as a floating point number.  I'd suggest 2.0 as the default
> for this ratio.

What frame should we then use? The selected frame?

That's not really logical, the frame that issues the call to load an
image (which is where we check the image size) may not be the frame
that ends up displaying it.