From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-buffer Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87d5lhvy7o.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87zmolwt06.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17258.33910.439963.480367@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131078258 20477 80.91.229.2 (4 Nov 2005 04:24:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 05:24:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXt6m-00031P-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:23:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXt6l-0000fW-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXt6d-0000fR-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXt6b-0000ex-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXt6b-0000eu-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EXt6b-0005Bd-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([65.92.243.185]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20051104042309.RHNE25800.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC4E4D7AEC; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:23:08 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17258.33910.439963.480367@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:43:18 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45383 Archived-At: >> What about the patch I'd suggested (see below)? >> Does it do any good? > What behaviour does this change? > I see: > A new frame takes focus and its window selected. > An existing frame doesn't take focus, raises and its window is not selected. This is with my patch? Is it any different from the behavior without my patch? Stefan