From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:56:53 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87d5k770y4.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87wtinrypp.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0dqm5ta.fsf@jurta.org> <87pso9wvjo.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134088855 22539 80.91.229.2 (9 Dec 2005 00:40:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lorentey@elte.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 01:40:53 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkWID-0005Wq-9N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:39:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkWIW-0006GF-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EkWHO-0006EX-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:38:30 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EkWHL-0006D5-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:38:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkWHH-0006CI-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkWIN-0004T3-Gr; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-35-29-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.35.29]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C191CE0; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:38:18 +0200 (EET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:29:34 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47268 Archived-At: > Ah, good idea. I implemented this in the patch at the end of this > message. It involves adding a new element to the frame struct, and > changing switch-to-buffer, bury-buffer and kill-buffer etc. to > maintain the list. > > This might be a good change, but at this point we want to avoid making > such far-reaching changes. Let's look for a less radical change that > would result in some sort of consistent behavior. Could you suggest another way of maintaining a frame-local list of buried buffers (buffers at the bottom of the frame-local buffer list accessible for cycling via `previous-buffer')? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/