From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:30:50 -0500 Message-ID: <87d54ob8c5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <87lkjcttv5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45C77904.8080308@gnu.org> <87hcu0l909.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d54otndk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abzs9xc4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lkjc5opu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170711082 7011 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2007 21:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 22:31:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEBQe-000469-I6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:31:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEBQd-0007Hj-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEBQQ-0007HH-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:30:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEBQQ-0007H3-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:30:58 -0500 Original-Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HEBQP-00065I-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:30:57 -0500 Original-Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id l15LUtCb009570; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:30:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id l15LUmEJ000060; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:30:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost ([18.19.7.58]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id l15LUl44014796; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:30:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from cyd by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HEBQI-0003MD-00; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:30:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon\, 5 Feb 2007 22\:25\:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65961 Archived-At: >> If there is a third scheme that someone has >> proposed, which I have missed, please point it out. > > I *don't* have to point it out. I want for us to take the time so > anyone can point a third, fourth or seventh alternative, or perhaps > choose one of the two you describe, but, why rush choosing? Then we are agreed. So: can anyone provide an alternative?