From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of LISP code Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:25:49 +0900 Message-ID: <87d53vme4y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <816883.134411172610967765.JavaMail.www@wwinf4102> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172615174 19546 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 22:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: alinsoar@voila.fr Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 23:26:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMAlo-0004W9-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:26:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMAlo-0005Hq-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMAle-0005Hd-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMAld-0005HN-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMAld-0005HE-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HMAlb-0008W0-RS; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:52 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-073.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.73] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1HMAlZ-0008UW-Hu; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:25:49 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D25832F43; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:25:49 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <816883.134411172610967765.JavaMail.www@wwinf4102> (A. Soare's message of "Tue\, 27 Feb 2007 22\:16\:07 +0100 \(CET\)") Original-Lines: 13 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66965 Archived-At: A Soare writes: > ( defun ( x &optional a b c d) > after applying an indent-function > stay in the same form, or to be rendered so: > (defun (x &optional a b c d) Removing whitespace around parentheses doesn't sound like indentation to me... -miles -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.