unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jay Belanger <jay.p.belanger@gmail.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/'
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:54:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d51sqinn.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0obnu$gkh$2@sea.gmane.org> (Christian Schlauer's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 21\:56\:51 +0200")


Christian Schlauer <cs-muelleimer-rubbish.bin@arcor.de> writes:
> Jay Belanger <belanger@truman.edu> writes:
...
>> Well, I think that's the proper way of doing it; even though there are
>> rules for interpreting expressions like a*b/c*d, that doesn't mean
>> writing the expression that way is a good thing to do -- it's just bad
>> form.  I don't think there is any difference between Calc's current
>> precedence rule and the more standard one for properly written
>> expressions.
>
> I did some more `research', and a*b/c*d is not bad form, and it is a
> properly written expression, see Wikipedia. Let me cite from
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Examples_from_arithmetic>:

As I said, there are rules for interpreting the above expressions.  
I also said that avoiding the parentheses is bad form; note that the
wikipedia article also says:

  Proper use of parentheses and other grouping symbols

  When restricted to using a straight text editor, parentheses (or
  more generally "grouping symbols") must be used generously to make
  up for the lack of graphics, like square root symbols. Here are some
  rules for doing so: 

  1) Whenever there is a fraction formed with a slash, put the
  numerator (the number on top of the fraction) in one set of
  parentheses, and the denominator (the number on the bottom of the
  fraction) in another set of parentheses. This is not required for
  fractions formed with underlines: 
    y = (x+1)/(x+2)
  ...
  5) An exception to the rules requiring parentheses applies when only
  one character is present. While correct either way, it is more
  readable if parentheses around a single character are omitted: 

    y = (3)/(x) or y = 3/x

    y = (3)/(2x) or y = 3/(2x)

> So besides Excel, Gnumeric, MATLAB, all pocket calculators, Wikipedia
> agrees with me, too.

Well, wikipedia also says

  Calculators

  Different calculators follow different orders of operations.

and gives several examples.

The reason for Calc's current behavior is because Dave Gillespie,
Calc's author, thought of "a b / c d" as representing 
  a b
  ---
  c d
To have it represent "a(b/c)d", the parentheses can (and, according to
wikipedia, should be) put in.  For those that really don't like
parentheses, an option to allow the user to decide for themselves the
relative precedence of * and / in Calc will be added, of course.

Jay

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-25 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-14 11:57 Calc: `*' binds more strongly than `/' Christian Schlauer
2007-04-14 15:09 ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-15 19:21   ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-15 20:05     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-17 12:47       ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-17 18:03         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-18  8:44           ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-18 19:27             ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-18 20:02               ` Davis Herring
2007-04-18 20:16                 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-18 21:43                   ` Davis Herring
2007-04-19 16:10                 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-20 11:13                   ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-20 13:40                     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-20 14:07                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-22  1:31                         ` Miles Bader
2007-04-22 10:19                           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-22 10:23                         ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-22 19:47                           ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-23 10:46                           ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-23 13:03                             ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-23 15:54                               ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-25 19:56                                 ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-25 20:54                                   ` Jay Belanger [this message]
2007-04-26  3:35                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26  4:06                                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-26 14:11                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26 21:07                                           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 15:07                                         ` Davis Herring
2007-04-26 16:01                                           ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-26 18:32                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-04-26 21:29                                               ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 23:17                                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-04-26 21:07                                     ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-27  1:27                                       ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-26 17:47                                   ` Davis Herring
2007-06-20 15:23                         ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 16:02                           ` Kim F. Storm
2007-06-20 17:13                             ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 17:29                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-06-20 17:54                               ` Jay Belanger
2007-06-20 19:14                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-06-20 19:28                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2007-06-20 20:18                                   ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-17 18:54         ` Jay Belanger
2007-04-18 21:55           ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-19  2:58             ` Daniel Brockman
2007-04-22 10:27               ` Christian Schlauer
2007-04-26 16:00                 ` Daniel Brockman
2007-04-19 15:16           ` Drew Adams
2007-04-19 17:05             ` David Kastrup
2007-04-19 17:18               ` Drew Adams
2007-04-19 17:33                 ` David Kastrup
2007-04-16 15:38     ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-17 12:47 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2007-04-18 21:29   ` Christian Schlauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d51sqinn.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=jay.p.belanger@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).