From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:27:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87d4skqxg7.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <20080101171120.GC3830@muc.de> <20080101.190535.32709273.wl@gnu.org> <20080101182742.GE3830@muc.de> <20080101.192802.05328072.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199273374 21107 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2008 11:29:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 02 12:29:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JA1nF-0003Gu-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:29:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JA1mt-0000Up-Ui for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:29:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA1mo-0000Tv-Hh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA1ml-0000Sv-Uq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:29:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JA1ml-0000Sr-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:29:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ppp-137-38.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.38.137] helo=ambire.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JA1mh-0000kT-9U; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JA1l2-0001tA-4J; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:27:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:53:40 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85880 Archived-At: () Richard Stallman () Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:53:40 -0500 This is based on surmise rather than knowledge. If it is wrong, where is the mistake? here is my understanding of the difference(s): cvs commit ~/src/emacs --[net]-> REPO git commit ~/src/emacs --[filesystem]-> ~/src/emacs/.git/REPO git push ~/src/emacs/.git/REPOSITORY --[net]-> REPO thus, to achieve a state where changes are publically accessible, cvs requires one operation, while git two. (i trust the docs others have sent will explain things further, but couldn't resist a little ASCII art... ;--). thi