From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New custom faces for rmail.el Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:05:40 +0000 Message-ID: <87d4r0ms0b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87skzzf992.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d4r23j4p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87myq66548.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ve4uoct8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202940393 8922 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2008 22:06:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 13 23:06:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPPkE-0006k7-Q0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:06:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPjl-0006Os-3H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPjf-0006Ly-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPjd-0006GL-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPjd-0006GF-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPPjc-0007Qq-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so931340ugf.48 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=pRYj+vW6Z8p6DaUhUNQWQZLeigI2aCyyWMiND74ZeWA=; b=sfQiQiQ6SYnI3KQ+ujNPzg+VURSyqSiPJxlqLNHctCQfL852r8zwrVI/qVwclwodrxm0ro7nhua3SZTCF3aqbmPx1D7Wcoy2LseCRrGDNB8mXEzYmAdo2kGMDO1svFA/vKnBLY3WxaWyZ7zPVBcGVVPgvIi3kCGvOM01x+XzyvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=Mtd4sbnSHTV3XNQ/LfFvuQM6nm7dzz1e2oKEtidxd2wcFRCzCjZh9UH5esxsK0EZBT7URYx4PMOThO4CM7cocpDjov/NHQt7OAEZDSbK31ikw3PZa+cHYTH0wrvCPk52DJQOdGBmcd8kWnBDdab0QSo9e8r66lLtN+nsssunLVc= Original-Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr1009377hue.31.1202940343056; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [131.227.122.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g12sm4052650nfb.27.2008.02.13.14.05.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A693157B18; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:05:40 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87ve4uoct8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:26:27 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88989 Archived-At: Bastien Guerry writes: > The patch below gets rid of `rmail-highlight-face' and use a single > `rmail-header-name' face. I have applied this patch. I still think it would be less confusing to be able to customize several faces. At least it would allow to display the headers the same way than before, as the default values for the new faces would inherit the actual hardwired faces. Let me know what you think. -- Bastien