From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Basic Bazaar guide for Emacs hackers. Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:02:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87d42z99gy.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87skbzblp5.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6log42q.fsf@red-bean.com> <87y6lo8zgi.fsf@telefonica.net> <87638sy5ab.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tywc8u7t.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6lowm3h.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ljho8pgt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87vdgswewc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbsc81wt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ljhnx66a.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259606923 27114 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2009 18:48:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 19:48:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFBIa-0004h2-8t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:48:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFBIZ-0000pS-Ut for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFAdo-0008ED-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFAdj-0008BO-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44307 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFAdj-0008BG-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from impaqm4.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.4]:42736) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFAdi-0001BM-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost2.adm.correo ([10.20.102.39]) by IMPaqm4.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id BSqH1d00P0r0BT63QW6Mi9; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:06:21 +0100 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.37.167.238]) by IMPmailhost2.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id BW6J1d00Y58wjBF1iW6K5H; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:06:21 +0100 X-TE-authinfo: authemail="981711563$telefonica.net" |auth_email="981711563@telefonica.net" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" In-Reply-To: <87ljhnx66a.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:40:13 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117978 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: > > > Karl's action has nothing to do here. Wasn't it clear on the quoted > > text? I was talking about you: > > Reread the thread. The sequence of events that raised this subthread was: Karl: It would be a good thing if you delete the page. Oscar: I think that the page will reduce the amount of support that emacs hackers will need on the transition. Stephen: My experience says that having multiple workflows increases the support load significantly. Oscar: Okay, then I'll delete the page (so there is one less workflow to care about) Stephen: I'll like to put back that workflow on the available documentation. So you said that having multiple workflows increases the burden, then I remove one workflow and you propose to add it back to the documentation. That's what I find contradictory. It is just that the pedantic maths freak in me can't resist pointing out logical inconsistencies :-) [snip] --=20 =C3=93scar