From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-x C-x Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87d3s8vtkv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4C94E03D.8090002@gmail.com> <87fwx699pc.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83tylmyclx.fsf@gnu.org> <4C961787.3090907@gmail.com> <878w2xsigj.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkvd5hwa.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285028237 19684 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2010 00:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 21 02:17:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxqXr-0000eN-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:17:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35398 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxqXq-0000P9-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52562 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxqXk-0000P4-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxqXi-0007jd-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po24.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.118]:38236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxqXi-0007jV-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014154.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po24.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8L0H51m013183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10B6CC018; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:17:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:09:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130549 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Now for the spinoff thread that keeps spinning off other ones: I'd be > willing to decouple C-x C-x from "(re)activate the region", but then we > need to find some other way to reactivate the region. Bindings that aren't taken include C-x SPC (similar to C-SPC) and C-x C-a ("a" for activate).