From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:02:42 +0800 Message-ID: <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290526283 25964 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 15:31:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Lilja Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 16:31:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKupx-0005oB-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:31:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41192 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKupx-0004LP-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46355 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKuPA-0006wf-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKuOV-0005Jy-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:48873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKuOU-0005Ji-RS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:02:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7so641190pzk.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:02:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=MXH2/jC+YG8PhkKjIz31dekBRh/4xlm8lfbH5Cn9qAQ=; b=d1M3LKe485aSHnFNKwHPjX5an84u6BIHTh3Db4LZheLH5A9Kx9PjLYvDbVdXTXvbwa 0319xJJsabOywHoG76tp5gs3RhZSuyU2oqeCGD6uDcSBZ7pcDWwkgBaHye5H4SsjwxC4 5aZtMils7KASu2DPvssH5XjfMaMq8Jc1ubA6k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=rYFQg+U2XCUXFCwYbMdtQX3+/6q+RDv+GKLcoWqtkSDA90AMPTJyuWsVKwL9GgQl7y Ul0dimBl9GiLz7cj07G4S02tLKW9Kgi9xONjwKiYhCVbN+GX2lKANixmhPRdashEpRoA t+CDykPjnvzfq065VV8woB7fSKSd/gSeauC9c= Original-Received: by 10.142.131.21 with SMTP id e21mr2998482wfd.7.1290524573770; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:02:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([120.140.38.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x18sm8022416wfa.11.2010.11.23.07.02.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:02:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC41D1B21; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:02:42 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Eric Lilja's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:06:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133052 Archived-At: Eric Lilja writes: > Unpacked the difference is almost 30 MB and the reason is that the > binaries in this latest set are much smaller than before. emacs.exe, > for instance, went from 37.6 MB to 13.8 MB. I have no idea if this > hints at a problem at all. I guess no debug info has been included (probably not a good idea for snapshots).