From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.2.94 pretest Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:28:49 -0800 Message-ID: <87d3mrr7n2.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87lj1hs3gl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297891958 4443 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2011 21:32:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 16 22:32:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppoz8-0003ks-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:32:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ppoz7-0008UI-NL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:32:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33504 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ppoy1-0007cJ-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppoxy-0004jh-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: from baybryj.net ([198.144.208.130]:60586 helo=lenovo) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppoxw-0004fv-EK; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from larsi by lenovo with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppoxu-0006oP-3U; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:31:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87lj1hs3gl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:49:14 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 198.144.208.130 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136120 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Sorry, I forgot about that. Does something like this work? [...] > ! (copyright-update nil)) [...] > ! (set (make-local-variable 'copyright-update) nil) Yes, that should work, I think? If we're not let-binding the variable, but only making it buffer-local, then loading copyright.el "in" this form won't leave us with an unbound copyright-update variable. I think? > Also, it would be nice if someone could figure out why this used to > work. Yes. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen