From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: Emacs 23.2.94 pretest Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:13:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87d3mi9qvp.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87aahva31q.fsf@gmail.com> <83mxlmskbm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298510018 22436 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2011 01:13:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 24 02:13:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsPls-0003AQ-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:13:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsPls-000244-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45160 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsPln-00022O-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsPll-0007lh-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:13:27 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsPll-0007lW-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:13:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsPlh-00036T-Vo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:13:21 +0100 Original-Received: from pool-151-204-159-214.ny325.east.verizon.net ([151.204.159.214]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:13:21 +0100 Original-Received: from sean.sieger by pool-151-204-159-214.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:13:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-151-204-159-214.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DPCEI+yYMZTkyDSPoo2j1g9Fu/U= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136422 gmane.emacs.windows:4842 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Given that the precompiled binaries were built with optimizations, I expect difficulties in interpreting the backtraces and anything GDB will report, so the useful next step (after you find out what can be found with these binaries) would be to try running an unoptimized build. I configure with `--no-opt', you weren't expecting me to? or, optimizations are made regardless?