From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs.el Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:21:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87d3mhcmyl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <8762sa9770.fsf@gmx.de> <87pqqibr30.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hcp1hok.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298576695 3948 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2011 19:44:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 24 20:44:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Psh7K-00079q-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:44:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsgDJ-0002kB-HT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36203 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Psfp9-00008d-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Psfp7-0001hq-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:34401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Psfp7-0001ha-Ez for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014252.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1OILsAM019880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E0FE160A5D; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:21:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877hcp1hok.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:11:23 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136450 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Considering that improved access to debbugs.gnu.org helps GNU Emacs > development itself, it might make sense to have this on trunk so that > maintainers always have the latest version and don't have to do > anything special to get it. If there is a strong concern that putting code on the package archive makes it less accessible for Emacs developers, how about merging ELPA into trunk builds? That is to say, set it up (maybe optionally) so that building Emacs from Bzr also installs the full contents of the package archive.