From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.3 release candidate Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: <87d3maraqw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pqqbze4t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4D6CE1E8.6080502@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299001831 29559 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2011 17:50:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 01 18:50:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuTiL-0008At-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:50:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuTiL-0003HY-Ey for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54568 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuTiE-0003Gb-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuTiD-0000Wy-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:32866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuTiD-0000Wn-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225133.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p21HoFoE025902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8540D1602DE; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:50:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D6CE1E8.6080502@online.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:09:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136668 Archived-At: Andreas R=C3=B6hler writes: > Compilation exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Mar 1 10:41:13: > > ... > Wrote MY-PATH/simple.elc > make[3]: Leaving directory `MY-PATH/lisp' > make[3]: Entering directory `MY-PATH/lisp' > Compiling MY-PATH/minibuffer.el > Wrote MY-PATH/sgml-input.elc > Compiling MY-PATH/rfc1345.el > Wrote MY-PATH/rfc1345.elc > Compiling MY-PATH/uni-input.el > Wrote MY-PATH/uni-input.elc > make[2]: Leaving directory `MY-PATH/leim' > make[1]: Leaving directory `MY-PATH/emacs-23.3' > make: *** [bootstrap] Fehler 2 > > Compilation exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Mar 1 10:41:13 I don't understand why Make is signalling an error here. Could you describe the procedure you used to build emacs, including the arguments supplied to configure and to make? You seem to be doing a bootstrap, which should not be necessary when building from the release tarball, (which normally only needs `./configure', `make', then `make install'.) > Also get a lot of warnings > > In beginning-of-defun-raw: > lisp.el:282:27:Warning: `font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function' is an > obsolete variable (as of Emacs 23.3); use `syntax-begin-function' > instead. These warnings are annoying but irrelevant.