unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net>
Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: clipboard/selection: customization vs. rebinding
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:59:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3hz5kp7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E07A0DB.7030503@harpegolden.net> (David De La Harpe Golden's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:12:59 +0100")

David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net> writes:

> I propose for 24 binding mouse-2 back to mouse-yank-at-click but with
> the addition of boolean customization to control the precise behaviour
> to allow the desired fd.o-type behaviour.

It's a tough decision.  It's true that mouse-yank-at-click has fringe
bindings, so anyone who wants the old behavior would need to rebind
those too, which is a nuisance.

However, if we introduce a boolean to control mouse-yank-at-click, that
makes it harder for users to have both mouse yank behaviors available
(by binding mouse-yank-at-click and mouse-yank-primary to different
keys)---unless we introduce yet another command that unconditionally
yanks from the kill ring, which I think is not worth the complication.

All in all, I think it's better to change the fringe bindings to
mouse-yank-primary.  For those users who are set on the old behavior,
the minor inconvenience of adding a few extra key bindings is
regrettable but not worth making the proposed change.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-26 21:12 clipboard/selection: customization vs. rebinding David De La Harpe Golden
2011-06-27 15:59 ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2011-06-29  3:19   ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-29 16:08     ` Chong Yidong
2011-06-30 16:57       ` Stefan Monnier
2011-07-01  5:12   ` David De La Harpe Golden
2011-07-03 18:30     ` Chong Yidong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d3hz5kp7.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
    --to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=david@harpegolden.net \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).