From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows' "split status" Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:23:43 +0800 Message-ID: <87d3cwr9hc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vcqqoekt.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBD6B63.4050607@gmx.at> <87vcqq6utg.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321154641 5616 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2011 03:24:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 13 04:23:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQfk-0005D4-NV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:23:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQfk-0005Oz-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQfh-0005Oj-8h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQfg-0004IC-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQff-0004I8-VM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from bb116-14-110-22.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.110.22]:57600 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPQff-0004Rw-5P; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:23:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:01:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146021 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> It might be useful for arranging windows when they are initially >> created, for the purpose of distributing them with equal heights/widths. >> But it's a bit unexpected for that to "stick around" and affect >> subsequent window resizing/deletion commands. If the user wants that, >> she should just set the variable. > > Actually I forgot why precisely I wanted them to "stick around". > >> Just using the value of `window-splits' would be better, yes. > > Done. Thank you. What about the nest status? Is there any reason that needs to stick around?