From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:45:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87d378q7jn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k42cwys8.fsf@gnu.org> <87398lgrat.fsf_-_@niu.edu> <871uo5c7r0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87pqbpj5j3.fsf@altern.org> <87aa2szgig.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehs4yrhz.fsf@gnu.org> <83k41vctyg.fsf@gnu.org> <83aa2rcnww.fsf@gnu.org> <8362dedgcb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkapi7qe.fsf@gnu.org> <83iphdb6dp.fsf@gnu.org> <878vi9gqst.fsf@gnu.org> <838vi9b2sr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334573170 28096 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2012 10:46:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 12:46:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SJjRg-00085h-Sh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJjRf-0005mj-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJjRa-0005mb-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJjRU-0002D6-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:54623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJjRO-00029I-53; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:45:50 -0400 Original-Received: by dake40 with SMTP id e40so6177310dak.39 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:45:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=aHj0bn1cGPsthFevZiZWHPr1hE4xNv4XW9cJw4xkeZQ=; b=rrQaSXgFFetzLGXMtfzlbtpKuOImjZS8pMBjHP0UgcGnLh6/gGrwW6B46w5kWmBaM2 lniL+xgq7Ix4Bv/ObcqXuMfyrPWJ5Sz0Tr6A+2GvCeSZULr+fCxHu3HXpyx8dIci9g2Q 87fPPDvokx2GGWH2abOUzhFOrA73YPX5wBV3UxOiwdszOOSLQce4CyC05+P4zYfxtBkg NRroPTwyP6ADLzKVZY1psFU7w6ninFuQyA0E3mGWlPUVlKMVX+VUjx8yYdwMkKwOVy7r MlNgjoEUKvNSu1DtOYyYelwfopgeBlnF0yIMrA33iAJ/z6xFENHxzQUnc5bvS921qFw2 /65Q== Original-Received: by 10.68.238.42 with SMTP id vh10mr27125289pbc.70.1334573145692; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.75.218.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s7sm17367050pbl.31.2012.04.16.03.45.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA3C826A0; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:45:32 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: <838vi9b2sr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:57:40 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.210.52 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149690 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I believe this is just the general git-preference issue, which has > nothing to do with "faster". You can beleive what you want. At the end of a slow link, bzr is painfully slow. A lot less painful now than it was when we first started using it, but still more painful than git or cvs ever was.