From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: async.el: A simple asynchronous framework for Emacs Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:36:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87d34tn2ja.fsf@gnuvola.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340224673 18568 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2012 20:37:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:37:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 20 22:37:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShReU-0008MQ-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShReU-0007aJ-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShReR-0007Zf-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShReP-00012H-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:58458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShReP-0000yf-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire (95.233.75.30) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.023.02) id 4F9BF1D306562111 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:36:43 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShRe6-0000tB-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:36:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:34:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.102 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151061 Archived-At: () John Wiegley () Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:34:46 -0500 However, If I delete *any one* of the setq statements above (it doesn't matter which), it works just fine. So it doesn't appear to be triggered by the length, Are you sure? Deleting an element changes the length of the message. What happens if you "semantically delete" an element while not perturbing (much) the aggregate message length by quoting it? or by any special characters. I'm having a tough time figuring this one out. Playing w/ repls to subprocs, i ran into the (IIRC) 509 byte message limit and discovered variable =E2=80=98process-connection-type=E2= =80=99. Maybe that is relevant here?