From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:20:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87d2yjhpx8.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355023252 20658 80.91.229.3 (9 Dec 2012 03:20:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 04:21:03 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXRv-0006d2-Gg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 04:21:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXRj-0005oC-6B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:20:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXRf-0005ny-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXRe-0007cq-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:20:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:57828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXRe-0007ca-Ou; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:20:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj3so1260034pad.0 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:20:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=6KaVZYYaMNcBwBsusmHaogYOllTdZmX/Dc0W5naqzP4=; b=Ye20Ig9LS/aGzQmmazQMDf+UhBspKoYQl2dTN9a1/lK57IkVVz45E/Fx7NexAlea/M rjpDR/hGwf5e285cxTjcjBMCqt4+aXRa+8MXNifIN3IMZMsMtNRtHvFRodK7j7qjfrY9 pQgieDuNPtAwKo/uZlRughI21NkA0I0BicxVH9iHgckgIf8hriFmKM/VU8GhiWHf8VMn L94tNx/QQTuIFbAdVnXo4ChlEfQ7toEkSXuQ7LsZSi1TcCu+nK3zpC/UyV88fcfNelpW Dd4HsS0Fy0PkE3dAfCcWW0lmMMJc5U7brCQYe9cUiNEXA+o5dpTT5c9XjNvRYsUPicM+ xfKg== Original-Received: by 10.66.73.225 with SMTP id o1mr25081612pav.70.1355023244420; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:20:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.75.194.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni3sm9371523pbc.2.2012.12.08.19.20.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:20:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AB041CC4; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 11:20:35 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:17:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155390 Archived-At: Dani Moncayo writes: > But, why the makefiles don't take care all necessary recompilations? They do, but not neccesarily in the correct order if there are interdependencies between changed files. Also, as in this case, a recompile will not remove the .elc files for .el files that have moved in the bzr tree.