From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA security Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:24:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2y2p6d7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <8738zf70ep.fsf@riseup.net> <871uejlbm1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87obhmzl2f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20121222141742.7494b429fe36e5ccef50cf6f@gmail.com> <87d2y2w9j5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqwas0gr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356182675 28686 80.91.229.3 (22 Dec 2012 13:24:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 22 14:24:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmP4G-0004ke-Mn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:24:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38548 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmP42-0007aP-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmP3x-0007aK-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmP3t-0001UX-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:24:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:58942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmP3t-0001UT-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm6so5629172wib.3 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:24:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=54hVb0/ERBfkKK2TpB6eF62rv5/UQ+1JHX0vDurTHPI=; b=dK5m35j0rHWf0uIDKV10WdllU+RJlq83EwDpgok/yPa3L2dGg54vuE3znviyMv6rny EV/kRITpQOgrtLdO5Cw4JiZbFwcrdDn5kcn7keAG/pCcw/h5MsuzADWWmtnx2CeU9FH5 vNn87ZxHdSDb3bP0jDccNEhsdyRehkYM2wS62gJaWqMynvS0jjbpAwsXZbHgeDyvM/Rm nkMapJCal1lQG6SPaQ1ER5Hn8t5a0keYXJGtnKT2eqyTbyYayutsPiAdsIPs2rA0Lstp s128Gk8+LulbqzzPKRImbnCxnadxoH5HbAwwvi8un9YZlXUfIxXE7O9OS0lE03jCOAI5 XKxQ== X-Received: by 10.180.20.109 with SMTP id m13mr28015743wie.16.1356182660447; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:24:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm23236470wiy.0.2012.12.22.05.24.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 05:24:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 480DF1C206E4; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:24:20 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87wqwas0gr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:03:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.176 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155763 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Well, if Emacs distributes the hashes and have a notion of certified > package for some of the GNU ELPA packages, that's already a progress. Actually, we could have a trusted packages that people can updated to get trusted new hashes from GNU ELPA packages. That'd help solving the problem of updating the hashes. -- Bastien