From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recursive edit in ispell sessions Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2tzkcuk.fsf@web.de> References: <87mwtaw2fc.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365779200 1726 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2013 15:06:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:06:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 12 17:06:44 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQfYo-0005uL-DL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:06:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQfYn-0005Ij-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQfYh-0005IP-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQfYb-0006ab-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:61218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQfYb-0006aJ-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.74.136.91]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCIYT-1UI6y240Lh-008rpP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:06:28 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87mwtaw2fc.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:44:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:QI5IjFr/PEWi8XIgS2G3YmfXD8tGkHsavg7Dkf8ZqDO xguetoAy5e0UyXWW9nJ+MtUOVzu8s+MhuejjwLTq1eGI+gnT9a Lb8QnfgVjS3wKuErtymXlDZx29OwGkqq0giN8Ax00hSO9Sk6Ni 3wQPfr0ryD8fZ/qgR+LBRt+LxOGiQnyjDqUB1nDNUMEo2xum6w gwsleQ9Pm16vKGjbn5RqrWn2L3GMERRwzcs1g8xgxo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158859 Archived-At: Hi, made it a bug report now - bug#14192. Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hi, > > I think the most common use of entering a recursive edit in an ispell > session (C-r) would be to modify the checked buffer - especially, to > substitute the currently checked word with some other text. But > whenever I exit the recursive edit (C-M-c), the deleted text reappears > and is highlighted again as unknown Try it with emacs -Q! > > My question: can we improve that? If this most simple case - replacing > the current word - is not possible, we shouldn't IMHO advertise C-r in > `ispell-help' etc. Or did I miss something? > > > Thanks, > > Michael.