From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:42:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2k59ckr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20140106165108.B6BF4380865@snark.thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389033767 1567 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 18:42:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 19:42:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0F8U-0000Gj-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:42:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0F8T-0000hQ-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:42:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0F8L-0000hF-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0F8D-00009E-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]:45399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0F8D-000091-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:42:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so3185047wiv.12 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=SmZQEB+rCN8+CMatxyeXZQ1IvPFqkN26h6GXSUW2Lqo=; b=NyVLN+Ew9ts8TophGqe6yaZS5omaRAefr52XjHi63O3wHoCwc07OE32B8klZC4QxHC kFpgFuCMWDexpEdcnyFJIc+INfqNbakB/YSocDcf5xAIS+xzk6bcytro1tZTODCcztkB Wghw7GDG8dqd30Lz/Kd6DvYD6RxlpVdgomk58ykRIk8aRLKmft4vVPFK+lltH+N87WZg d9J8kUg2Ev+dDZGw7XV7fVks6o1suUw7VZWI8RwretkUe251yVindZRutSsZMq3eUsI0 sg6/YP+eAPXKzJa0ud4HIotTfbtEoNl8L6X0t0sBFN+vxd68m47kiIjm+2TOdGXdD3sC qCgw== X-Received: by 10.194.185.237 with SMTP id ff13mr2624463wjc.64.1389033752209; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:42:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ks3sm23324733wjc.10.2014.01.06.10.42.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:42:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 223FA1C2064A; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:42:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:40:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167497 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > >> I am now recommending that Andreas perform steps 1-3 at his convenience, no >> sooner than 2014-01-06T11:59:00 and no later than 2014-01-07T11:59:00 - >> that is, sometime tomorrow. > > Why? Where's the hurry? We're in a freeze, we should be concentrating > on fixing bugs, not learning new ways and new procedures... Agreed. The discussion itself has been distracting, even if useful. Also, a more formal count would help to let those who are less vocal express their views/vote. PS: I appreciate Jordi's points and have been testing hg more lately, so maybe my previous vote will be git-or-hg. Need to test more. -- Bastien