From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:49:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2i9ee8t.fsf@engster.org> References: <87wqgr4v18.fsf@yandex.ru> <53064BD0.7070009@yandex.ru> <87ha7tr5bo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ppmhecd8.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y50z90pd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87txbn8r6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8338j717oe.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjlf6tdx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sir7yue7.fsf@gnu.org> <8761o3dlak.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83bnxuzyl4.fsf@gnu.org> <871tyqes5q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87a9ddg7o8.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393451377 10808 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2014 21:49:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , Emacs developers To: John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 26 22:49:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WImMI-0002kM-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:49:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WImMI-0005ax-5M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WImM9-0005Uw-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WImM2-0001Ty-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:53109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WImM2-0001Ts-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:49:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=x7H8A9Yu8CqtsuNbBlFBm9RBKQBg2YGLxL0e3R3BW50=; b=XV+vN97fbpFYM8ltPFuqUa0giOMF289tzrc/K1NFmMk8z3ed+LIn8aOb677M1D951X7beLWFOz63GdH5H6EGrxje3TDsLxnNS7QmDhHdUJJDdLixGm5O2Bx1y0+MtDzo; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-054-035.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.54.35] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WImM0-0000ZA-2h; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:49:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Yates's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:19:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: John Yates , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3sc?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ar?= Fuentes , Emacs developers X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169897 Archived-At: John Yates writes: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM, David Engster wrote: >> >> IMHO, "Refactoring C++" should not be in the job description. > > Yet Google is happily applying clang to just that problem: Where did I say that clang cannot do that? I did say that if you will accept nothing less than perfection, then by all means implement your clang-based silver bullet. Stefan already said that he is not opposed to it. -David