From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rasmus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87d28kv9n6.fsf@gmx.us> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416322706 28097 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 14:58:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:58:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 15:58:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkEU-0006dx-RF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:58:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkEU-0005ZI-70 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:58:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkEL-0005NP-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkEF-0002Zv-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkEF-0002Zp-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqkED-0006Xk-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:58:01 +0100 Original-Received: from 109.201.154.199 ([109.201.154.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:58:01 +0100 Original-Received: from rasmus by 109.201.154.199 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:58:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.201.154.199 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAmJLR0QA/4ePzL8AAAAJcEhZ cwAAAEgAAABIAEbJaz4AAAJLSURBVEjHzZa7geQwDEMdoxm0wlJYCVtBMWgHwQXyT7O7txceI9vj J1EkCM8xSbWdJN2yx7mi0RJRCXU/PCqpWddecf3okm2hMpUHYMx7UTsDwPcCsTGC895BLz4uiXw/ QL3fz9Hh+162vVKWlCQF5Q2o+31v2+lJ0gDoJOUdqM/3LSoZjAUk0WzAzifxEIoxdgbKfsYcdz1e laJDJlGjvgXknaAaTAZF+BvAqh0ogJVURVD2qhxwbOohbKs1XBWAU3tZq2Oz7a2wnkpiT8XMnhL8 yO8WVLoS2+VUfwB0wtl3sEexMpXBfAKKkXkUfO4hygWOduII1v6NLSl12XEpEdld15wcQpb8+OTq ZmtXjPrU6EFlOkmE/BS27ebZB51Xu8wTTc+SOWXbZq15uMtWStJXmwo9U0vfkB276Et8N9A8eUGO LTgxa4otD3sDlpwvB1nFHSZpcJromPMClgFwqWqlLTWcsypmefgGmvKA8VmaIUAoa2STlPQATXSS DC7hDlpr9b57rT5eg7YCOi+XJHqSRwSt40uXKF91SmImfY6cSfhnYMmUswp19SZfgNs4jUqMs3kf rvFWxD3yZGJgn5+vwCNTYSx92tYn4JenNAHszvoJeOhE5y62pvhlRDdrh+Ii4MTL3qwPm9nyhzPl 1a1BjdSyN/t9A0K51hnGyYAAUN6c6dhagGuwVVkNs9mb930c+tns/laanvlLH1YMnxmv+Qeg+ml5 d/0GyI5vKxS2z+6366Nf1qlNTt8Cnn79g/Akv57h5/gPgT/tvnoH3s4GngAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:S+2P5iJLpSNjafAXTa2nvK1TXdU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177551 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > This is trivial to implement in the NSM, but what should the defaults > be? IMO: Yes. > IMAP, POP3: I think most users would want to be warned here > SMTP, IRC: I don't think anybody cares > NNTP: They might care if they're sending a password Excuse my potential ignorance: I think I sent a (username, password) tuple to my SMTP server when sending mails. Why should I not care if it's encrypted? If someone snatched the password they'd be able to get to my IMAP, no? In fact, in my setup, offlineimap talks to IMAP server, but Emacs talks directly sents via the SMPT server. -- Summon the Mothership!