From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Environment variables for remote processes Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:43:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87d28f8npo.fsf@gmx.de> References: <030C5AEB-C009-4995-B153-6EECD44802C8@fb.com> <87y4rkhdt6.fsf@gmx.de> <87y4rf2jtx.fsf@gmx.de> <87r3x6eq8w.fsf@gmx.de> <87mw7rtnxg.fsf@gmx.de> <83a93rduz4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9xxvf31.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <87mw7oe2y3.fsf@gmx.de> <87h9xwdvxx.fsf@gmx.de> <87egsz3vhc.fsf@gmx.de> <87fvddvphh.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416656658 19830 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2014 11:44:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, dpittman@fb.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 22 12:44:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs96n-0003qS-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:44:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs96n-0005X3-GJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs96g-0005Wv-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs96a-00032n-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:60415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xs96Z-00032f-Ra; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.34.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbfnB-1Xbqjo0MnF-00J26J; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:43:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:46:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fEDk9/ZEc3U4HCdwogiO/Pjwv6jPe2OP/VtAN3EKA0bwtIN7qzO POTpjPGRejhKGhvTEjwmuFtiUPfcpqAFAe4Exu8A07pxt1+AHTK7GY3xkQQ7pYx3Q+kyJ5s LaHBjSSlwRI2fvKS3t9JBcx1Y14gufiW1hJ4eQ63t6f0tHwCXnuyXuY3DUh/A2kvA+wulav 80LIvLqffXEid0Hu2mm5A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177998 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I think it's basically the same situation as with setq: either it's done > within a `let' (and we're back to the let-binding case), or it affects > all subsequent subprocesses. Well, a pushed a respective patch to the trunk. Seems to work at least fine with `eshell' and `shell', which are not trivial examples. Let's see, whether other people start to rant. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.