From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 e5c17f4: Fix todo-mode category movement Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 00:51:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1qgu7az.fsf@gmx.net> References: <20160326221513.15789.84807@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459036324 4212 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2016 23:52:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 00:51:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajxzn-0003rb-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 00:51:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34064 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajxzm-0003qV-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajxzY-0003q9-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajxzT-0000ZA-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajxzT-0000Z3-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([89.245.111.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mbx62-1aQnFD1pV0-00JLGR for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 00:51:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:17:41 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:e1gu1+CdVtiHEElwjfRC6iu7+rQ6OOgT2MAOcrGwJQHAdjDs7P+ getsWZHgGMHPBH/JuU4vbTU5SWPHgmliGAuEKACHo9yaEDl3KHqBlddaZe9xEP7L5ATP2g5 U7QOJkh9G0pDCeL9y9r0Zzu8J8B6pZkY+f2St0+brTmNjRVncQBB5ydhR3uQNY/uJiPfZf0 9Rq8kKDFKts0hjtxFpOew== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DUyfJYvsCuw=:Lk/2qUWiHSiR2IhWH0eEYi z+1mb4AyAnaS1iUA7C3X6oCveZhvIWQTh37lggnyVSOEVOutR8c/n8FoYAJPOSrkMlVs2OMe+ cJMcgm5TMJ+f7VnWELw7+MWv+3goXh4Pl+Zaand2C4XM6IwC9uzQ27MMh6QsRyUmyFbbhBccf QJjfP7RvmB9IqRuQchHUY/8OcOi4QKkeSAnDyMJNaHihuF5Dfn0DNXQWL7G5FAWSd+5+OebGT zYM8oF7PR6dYuR/eiVmcOuzKMS52DkHRzWPlpXhRvHQ3cmwSYfbBtu5luRJVlIV1XJ1Ak25DM vrqR+HW5sChpNNegWJMRYo6gW0A3UcQqpLinRDDOBOscDRhmyKHr3LtQIHPooN3jR9yGLOLFw k41cifA5/xAv8CDvoD9kUWFMmKobAItq1zEt83IefvqDrWHAfDJ7L87z3UgvFjdyYyjJ6tFq1 D7hLd9CC6IXv/W+sdKEy/B+ILaLRDOnavMRBRNRu2H+avoSNoi1v443mnjzVCye7VhsuQgCQk 3jExyyyf0iBuiRyJ1U1UIMHPFpqGMxZXVvAtTBnw5ty2riMBfR/ldQDtynt8Z6TdY/M/yemem NG5Pv2IR33+m6wcIACwr5KG21HpcFlsAamsSqiL9OJwnjGsOXkOGBuShbPoHb9/vMhvN/uUde EQ/UT1bAOmRTJUfJ7TArc6PVubMfCYdvwVIkXbiZiAY0zZkxKHld8s6afHE+DfFfXgcO9WWr7 3kRMWYMCuaHV9f2NKuScpdICfb4AYUcmWIPAV1nxr9Ty4ZqIc6wFomwdPOwEDGypNkdT9oju X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202270 Archived-At: On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:17:41 -0700 John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Stephen Berman writes: > >> branch: emacs-25 >> commit e5c17f46785e2eca165ccd5aa890f212c6a61ca1 >> Author: Stephen Berman >> Commit: Stephen Berman > >> Fix todo-mode category movement > > Hi Stephen, did this address an open issue? Any fixes applied to emacs-25 at > this point so reference the bug they fix, so I can refer to them. Otherwise, > I'm not sure who raised the issue, or why it needs to be addressed before > release. This was a bug I encountered yesterday while using todo-mode. It was clearly broken behavior, so I assumed the fix should go to emacs-25, and since I'm the todo-mode maintainer, I thought it was all right to commit the fix without filing a bug report. Would you prefer me to make a bug report first in such cases? To be sure, the bug existed since I added this version of todo-mode to the Emacs repository almost three years ago, so it's not a regression; yet it was clearly a bug. If I encounter another such bug in todo-mode should I wait for approval from a core maintainer to commit to emacs-25? Steve Berman