From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dependency graph for Emacs Lisp files Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:57:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0holvyd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <8736ilnmp7.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87pnlphyxk.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87tvb1m66r.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87lfwdhvzg.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zhktkou0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="231522"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Phillip Lord To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 01 18:00:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htDUv-000xvf-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57012 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDUu-0001ZF-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDSk-0001XT-Ad for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDSj-0007U4-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:36278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDSi-0007TU-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htDSd-0001iA-JR; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:57:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:29:55 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239110 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But triggering recompilation isn't enough: b.elc has to be deleted, >> otherwise compiling a.el will just load the old b.elc. > > I don't think so: the dependencies mean that a.el will not be recompiled > until b.el has been recompiled. But we have cyclical dependencies... Just removing the .elc files seem like a pretty easy way to do what we want to do... Are there any drawbacks here? (Or use `load-prefer-newer', as was suggested. Same effect here, really.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no