From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Multi-OS Emacs buildbot? Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:56:03 -0500 Message-ID: <87czz497q4.fsf@gnuvola.org> References: <871rfliy8h.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0tdr60h.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871rflhbsq.fsf@gnus.org> <87czz5r56v.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87tushfwkv.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn35fwhv.fsf@gnus.org> <875z4xr4j2.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87h7ohfvtx.fsf@gnus.org> <871rfl9pd4.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87czz5ynl9.fsf@passepartout.tim-landscheidt.de> <87tusgnb6d.fsf@codeisgreat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40279"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 20 09:58:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kquYG-000ANR-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:58:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kquYF-0007mS-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:58:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kquXe-0007Mq-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from se25.mailspamprotection.com ([35.192.5.156]:54163 helo=delivery.mailspamprotection.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kquXX-00076V-PF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from 241.110.209.35.bc.googleusercontent.com ([35.209.110.241] helo=giow1035.siteground.us) by se25.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kquXT-0004hk-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:58:05 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnuvola.org ; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=V5JBEzZlKaetmPcZYkX3ql/HzlqUNv7iehtflFnuzr4=; b=iIl0F4NQQfl7oYOYJBVOW9Jvyd 9YRv0IPBo6Ty/nDqAu0yujy0dcjDyaa+ExoYd2de+grb1mZboSANqw/vxlNkRyFcOalrQp38RMLqo TlmnOLBEw7GEw8pc/h8QFLsl21gzhLr6djbMoPi2tqdkLY7VwOnx9KvItivpD/VPuFOw=; Original-Received: from [50.89.166.226] (port=53960 helo=miasma) by giow1035.siteground.us with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90.1) (envelope-from ) id 1kquXO-000ICs-4N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 08:57:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87tusgnb6d.fsf@codeisgreat.org> (Pankaj Jangid's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:47:46 +0530") X-Originating-IP: 35.209.110.241 X-SpamExperts-Domain: giow1035.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Username: 35.209.110.241 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=35.209.110.241@giow1035.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.14) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT/zbsHWlS4r7t1HnVuk+WpgPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5yIihPVXVFAYa+LPll+F2R2qA/pdxL9H6My4aKblWy1s7Zi LnYjZdO+WEONnpk9a+paa40DxZPJuLUk3zkVKd8pdqDuc9lS3Nx+9iKFZ9qooJJVRKyFCRrxWkR6 oZhlSr0PQmK8ZeOeF7w8DFkgvJsWiFKfD1jKgYfH+6S5qDVYoNnFT237f4mC5BiIUfNXP3MXKu1V bgppFJRGoXLED7mHFMezBtsH+Fr5latICLxKTLF7XtAh+BMY6BfObX3/dANR1KFcGqMiorHmOcHv PdiGGnd5bMZA642MQGj9YRs9EBjUOmSnUu+ib6eENMSiUHaQHXehajF9VN8il9+E/vSHVpGb8ted /DA8b4vk3ZTlWN2BGPrKtAC7FsU49Klio9+YsXTCpNwQX5GuA33x6QVqaggHkNHKqJzNZuHo4cbr sUXtQhr43M8eCrxQqJFh3M54nzxvje8eZ3fS7i47mF8XB392eNvDmAiz8zBDUDaN5yk4xAm9D8KT eKJT7gNACPfBp8GgCRFRXP2MsoebOSvo2Yuh6t0fbK+w91teuBhtoxPin/QPSBd9jYb0NbXEJDRf 3SRJQsHriaQrCY9tjuNQB5hQ6nsDvccjqgmDvD9Wh3cQKzHbbzEgp2eOx13KaKnM/PFqE+qWB2Ex +ON9GuUcEmXxzRzRAAO4r3HiRIRPq+Wlc1fqXub/7zceJVoZJwuZ3gYQJ0zMrx3Ec/sSwGkJkilT ObJ/1fNBRIw4b2ya6Nlyk+AQkotsP X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.mailspamprotection.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=35.192.5.156; envelope-from=ttn@gnuvola.org; helo=delivery.mailspamprotection.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261316 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Pankaj Jangid () Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:47:46 +0530 My use-case is very simple. I pull and make bootstrap daily. And on some odd day if the build breaks, I want to file a bug. If I have the information which commit broke it then it helps the maintainers. Even if the failure is monotonous (not sure what to call linear may be), that may help in narrowing down the issue. It could be inaccurate but still. It sounds like you're talking about "continuous" vs "transient". What you seek is the first in a series of failures, no matter the subsequent outcomes, in an attempt to reduce the variables. No matter the subsequent outcomes, because if they are: (a) success (transient state) we still might be legitimately worried about that failure mode re-appearing; (b) failure (continuous state) we want to debug w/ as few changes as possibile (reducing the variability). Bottom line: first failure is easier to debug (usually :-D). Did i miss anything? =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen ----------------------------------------------- (defun responsep (query) ; (2020) Software Libero (pcase (context query) ; =3D Dissenso Etico (`(technical ,ml) (correctp ml)) ...)) 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA =2D-------------------------------------- 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iG4EARECAC4WIQR0jqDoHLinSJv6bORnAyIkTIB1AgUCX98RpRAcdHRuQGdudXZv bGEub3JnAAoJEGcDIiRMgHUCrh8AnjuwKO0hXAoIteTcAEfQtFa61a11AKCO8ylo kPZCk16H6j+Ww40LpGS7iQ== =wstu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--